Does 'Regime Change' in Iran Mean the same to Everyone?
Caveat: We must define 'Regime Change' more precisely. As it may mean different outcomes to different interests jockeying for position for the future of Iran.
Currently, as in the past before Ahmadinejad, there are missions and efforts by some political elite in the west (mostly in European capitals, and also amongst US Democrats who sing the same tune as EU vis a vis Iran, e.g., Iranian regime appeasers like Kerry, Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Jimmy Carter, etc.) who are pursuing the replacement of Ahmadinejad and Khamenei gang with Khatami and/or Rafsanjani faction to call it good in Iran. Now, THAT’s NOT Regime Change. The Iranian people have already been down that trap and they do not wish a repeat or return to the same, old ‘smiling wolf disguised as a sheep’ rule of the ‘reformists.
The definition of "Regime Change", as far as the overwhelming majority of the Iranian people are concerned, is a total and complete elimination of the current Islamic 'Republic' including all of its parts: i.e., the eradication of all the hardliners as well as the total decapitation of all the the so-called 'reformists' with various European ties (i.e., led by the left over Euro-mullahs like Khatami brothers and the Rafsanjani Mafia group.)
"Regime Change", as far as the Iranian people are concerned, is a total and complete elimination of the current Islamic 'Republic' including all of its parts: i.e., the eradication of all the hardliners as well as the total decapitation of all the the so-called 'reformists' with European ties (i.e., led by the left over Euro-mullahs like Khatami and Rafsanjani.)
The Regime Change that the Iranian people desire, is a flip and a 180 degree change to a secular democracy void of any religion wherein no clergy, and especially no former official(s) of the current Islamic 'Republic,' are allowed to participate in politics according to the revised Iranian constitution which will ban any such participation by clergy in the new government.
The Islamist 'reformists' like Khatami inside Tehran Theocracy of Terror only wished they had a little bit of Kerensky's guts or genuineness. Khatami and Rafsanjani and their cohorts are actually in cahoots with the Iranian Bolsheviks like Khamenei and Ahmadinejad, Jannati, etc, but they pretend otherwise just to deceive the west and the Iranian people alike. They are all in cahoots with one another to 'save' the regime at any cost to land and people. The only difference is that the Khatamites do it by being cunning and 'pragmatic' with the west, but the hardliners do it straight out without an apology. Both groups are evil, playing good cop/ bad cop for the west and the Iranian masses.
The question that begs to be asked here is this: Is everyone involved on the same page when they talk about the definition ‘Regime Change’ in Iran? Otherwise, it’s easy to fall into the same, old trap with a definition-less term, only to wake up one morning and see Rafsanjani as the president, and Khatami as the ‘Supreme Leader’, with a content EU and Democratic White House supporting both all the way ('Grand Bargain' anyone?) We have seen that farce before, and it ain’t pretty.
http://mor2com.blogspot.com/
Currently, as in the past before Ahmadinejad, there are missions and efforts by some political elite in the west (mostly in European capitals, and also amongst US Democrats who sing the same tune as EU vis a vis Iran, e.g., Iranian regime appeasers like Kerry, Biden, Barack Hussein Obama, Jimmy Carter, etc.) who are pursuing the replacement of Ahmadinejad and Khamenei gang with Khatami and/or Rafsanjani faction to call it good in Iran. Now, THAT’s NOT Regime Change. The Iranian people have already been down that trap and they do not wish a repeat or return to the same, old ‘smiling wolf disguised as a sheep’ rule of the ‘reformists.
The definition of "Regime Change", as far as the overwhelming majority of the Iranian people are concerned, is a total and complete elimination of the current Islamic 'Republic' including all of its parts: i.e., the eradication of all the hardliners as well as the total decapitation of all the the so-called 'reformists' with various European ties (i.e., led by the left over Euro-mullahs like Khatami brothers and the Rafsanjani Mafia group.)
"Regime Change", as far as the Iranian people are concerned, is a total and complete elimination of the current Islamic 'Republic' including all of its parts: i.e., the eradication of all the hardliners as well as the total decapitation of all the the so-called 'reformists' with European ties (i.e., led by the left over Euro-mullahs like Khatami and Rafsanjani.)
The Regime Change that the Iranian people desire, is a flip and a 180 degree change to a secular democracy void of any religion wherein no clergy, and especially no former official(s) of the current Islamic 'Republic,' are allowed to participate in politics according to the revised Iranian constitution which will ban any such participation by clergy in the new government.
The Islamist 'reformists' like Khatami inside Tehran Theocracy of Terror only wished they had a little bit of Kerensky's guts or genuineness. Khatami and Rafsanjani and their cohorts are actually in cahoots with the Iranian Bolsheviks like Khamenei and Ahmadinejad, Jannati, etc, but they pretend otherwise just to deceive the west and the Iranian people alike. They are all in cahoots with one another to 'save' the regime at any cost to land and people. The only difference is that the Khatamites do it by being cunning and 'pragmatic' with the west, but the hardliners do it straight out without an apology. Both groups are evil, playing good cop/ bad cop for the west and the Iranian masses.
The question that begs to be asked here is this: Is everyone involved on the same page when they talk about the definition ‘Regime Change’ in Iran? Otherwise, it’s easy to fall into the same, old trap with a definition-less term, only to wake up one morning and see Rafsanjani as the president, and Khatami as the ‘Supreme Leader’, with a content EU and Democratic White House supporting both all the way ('Grand Bargain' anyone?) We have seen that farce before, and it ain’t pretty.
http://mor2com.blogspot.com/
posted by Jeanne De Rakhsh at 4:54 AM
1 Comments:
I agree with your Blog on Regime change. it is not defined at all.
Ghazal OMID
Post a Comment
<< Home